California Pesticide Agency Gives Phony Award to Easter Lily Farmers for “Reducing” Pesticide Use When the Agency’s Own Numbers Show a Dramatic Increase In Pesticides

PRESS RELEASE   March 19, 2015

In one of the most Orwellian displays of deference to industry ever shown by a California state agency, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) will today give Easter lily farmers an “Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Innovator Award” for allegedly reducing pesticide use “by about 50 percent over the last 20 years.”

Statistics provided on DPR’s own web site not only show no decrease in pesticide use on lily fields in Del Norte County, California, but actually show that lily farmers have increased pesticide use by 65 percent in that time period. The award also flies in the face of recent revelations by another state agency, the California North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, that pesticides are causing severe toxicity in streams that feed the estuary of the Smith River.

The Smith is California’s wildest and cleanest river, and is considered to be one of the most important streams on the West Coast for protecting endangered salmon and steelhead. This is especially true for coho salmon, which are disappearing throughout the state. Coho can spend a year longer than other salmonids in fresh water, often in estuaries.

Ninety-five percent of Easter lily bulbs used in North America are grown on the Smith River Plain, which surrounds the Smith River estuary.

Easter lily growers use approximately 300,000 pounds of pesticides annually, including California’s highest per-acre applications of the fumigants 1,3-dichloropropene and metam sodium. Other highly toxic pesticides used adjacent to the Smith River estuary include chlorothalonil, diuron, disulfoton, phorate, ethoprop, and maneb.

“‘Appalled’ isn’t a strong enough word for how we feel about this ‘award,’” said Greg King, Executive director of Siskiyou Land Conservancy, which has worked since 2004 to reduce pesticide use on Easter lily fields. “Not only has pesticide use jumped dramatically in the twenty-year period cited by DPR, but recent water testing results show that Easter lily pesticides are contaminating California’s most important remaining salmonid habitat. But maybe what’s most amazing is that DPR’s own numbers directly contradict the press release. It’s flabbergasting.”

DPR claims that that the Easter Lily Research Foundation “has adopted a number of practices to reduce their pesticide use by about 50 percent over the last 20 years.” Actually, Easter lily pesticide use increased from about 180,000 pounds in 1992 to 297,000 pounds in 2012 (the latest year that numbers are available), an increase of 65 percent in the exact 20-year period cited by DPR. Moreover, these numbers come from DPR’s own web site.

http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur92rep/chemcnty/delnor92.pdf

http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur12rep/chemcnty/delnor12_ai.pdf

DPR also contends that Easter lily growers are “developing a strategy … to control nematodes while reducing the use of fumigants.” Yet the dramatic increase of pesticides from 1992 to 2012 came almost entirely in the form of toxic fumigants.

In 2012 lily growers applied 115,930 pounds of 1,3-dichloropropene and 131,913 pounds of metam sodium (the chemical that, in 1991, spilled into the Sacramento River, killing everything for 40 stream miles before diluting in Lake Shasta). These are both highly toxic, carcinogenic fumigants that disrupt reproduction in many species, including salmon but also humans. Both pesticides have seen dramatic increases on Easter lily fields over the past 20 years, and especially during the past 10 years.

DPR also claims that lily growers’ “approaches often involve huge commitments of time, research and a determination to effectively control pests without harming the environment.” But the harm is now well documented. Last year the state Water Board revealed that its testing of surface waters feeding the Smith River estuary, and which run through lily fields, show “acute (and) chronic reproductive toxicity,” meaning that invertebrates that make up the basis of the salmonid food chain cannot survive or reproduce in that water. The Water Board also found 10 different pesticides in the water. It was the fourth time since the mid-1980s that the Water Board had discovered significant pesticide contamination in the ground- and surface waters of the Smith River estuary.

The Smith River contains the most viable coho salmon population in the California. It is considered a “core watershed” for coho and other species, meaning that recovery of the species in other California streams may hinge on making sure that the Smith River remains healthy.

Pesticides are also known to affect human health. For many years residents of the town of Smith River, which is surrounded by Easter lily fields, have complained of birth defects, miscarriages, skin diseases, respiratory and vision problems, and cancer that they attribute to the massive pesticide use virtually in their back yards.

#          #          #

Update: We called the Department of Pesticide Regulation to complain about these glaring errors and the bogus award, and spoke with DPR Senior Environmental Scientist Mark Robertson, who said he would check it out. Two hours later Robertson phoned and emailed to say that DPR had made an “error” in writing the press release. Here’s Robertson’s email:

Dear Mr. King, Thank you for your inquiry this morning about the 2014 Innovator Award press release. You are correct that there has not been a 50% reduction in pesticides use in Easter lily production over the past 20 years. The error in the press release has been corrected. The error was caused by the inadvertent condensation of two unrelated sentences from the organization description that was used as the basis for the press release. Unfortunately, though I and several other people reviewed the press release, no one here caught the error. Thank you for contacting me so that we could correct the press release in a timely manner.

5 Responses

  1. So, they’ve cancelled the award, right?

  2. Did DPR say “I studied how government can work to support our partners at the Easter Lily Research Foundation, but I ain’t no good at math.”?

  3. Thank You for opening my eyes.
    Your work is valued and appreciated.

  4. Thank you very much for doing something about the toxins we live with. We have been unable to have our well tested for specific toxins, but have suffered severe illness from unknown causes since moving here. We are next door to a lily field, which we often see sprayed with chemicals. One day our lips were numb from something they had sprayed. They are wearing masks, but we are not! We don’t drink our well water anymore either.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: